In a blog post, discuss a company that had a PR crisis. What
was the crisis and how did they handle it? How could they have measured their
communications effectiveness during and after the crisis? What could they have
done differently?
When you're finished with your post:
- Click
the link above to submit the link to your blog post.
- Post
a link to your blog post on the PR Crisis discussion board for Module 11.
- Comment
on your peers' posts.
What was the crisis and how did they handle it?
Gucci is a famous luxury brand in the world. In China, it
has great public’s praise and corporate image. Last year, it experienced a serious
crisis in Shenzhen China which in my recollection. Sep. 23, 2011. Two former
employees of Gucci public a letter online named < an open letter to top
management from mass resignation employees> which made media reported for a
long time. Since that time, Gucci become
a “Sweatshop”, “Abuse employees”, “management confusion”, “employees overworked”.
After employees abused event’s exposure, it damage Gucci’s
social image deeply, Gucci use PR means immediately. Firstly, Button their lips from top management
to laborial staff, and they made a statement that pointed out this event was
distorted and enlarged. Everything they did is wanted to stop negative massages’
spread and become worse. But this action did nothing to do to solve this
crisis. Media continue follow-up report and government start to investigate.
How could they have
measured their communications effectiveness during and after the crisis?
What they did after this crisis is trying to hide everything.
Employees and managers silent on this topic and publish a statement explain
that this event is not exist. The words to clarify themselves can’t change
public thinking.
The only way for Gucci to measure this PR crisis is after
their action, how is the negative reports and disgruntled discussion from
people? I have only to say, this PR crisis is totally failure. They want to
cover and hide the truth, whatever the truth is, what they did just make people
don’t trust them anymore. The core of it
is communication, not about how to pretend it never happen.
What could they have
done differently?
In my opinion, their PR crisis can’t do any help to this
situation but make it worse. It can’t cover the management confusion. I think
what they should do is:1. Enhance their internal communication in the company;
provide a way to make employees an top management communication directly. 2.
Multinational corporation like Gucci, Converse, Zara have this kind of scandals
in China. Actually it have already have thorough management system in mainland.
They should treat their employees equal in different places.
After crisis, most companies anxious to clarify the event or
list the truth, they trying to use their own words to change media’s report
direction and public perceive. But this method usually useless. The first thing they should do is to get the
trust from public. Make business practice hyalinize temporarily. And find out
management loopholes and improve it. So
that the social image will reverse.
No comments:
Post a Comment